There is a lot of talk in the UK about the press and politicians not doing enough to counteract genocide when it is happening in the World.
I’m trying to think of the logic that they would want to do this and where it would lead them to.
Basically, oppression of any kind is always resisted ; and unless the black fist of a dictatorship and a seriously psychotic belief that opposition should not exist ; usually the opposition will eat away and eventually win the day or at least the ability to live together peacefully and productively.
If our Press and Politicians are supporting an anhilistic,psychotic oppresser, then they are themselves anhilistic and psychotic which unfortunately precludes them from being either journalists or indeed politicians.
I really can’t see that this is the case, I feel that the situations that exist where genocide is happening are so complex that no one apart from the aggressive protagonist has the answer. They are the ones who need to change their behaviour.
Press and politicians favouring one side or the other,will not achieve anything
thenotsomightyom 